Saltar para o conteúdo principal
Todos os artigos
OperationsApr 6, 2026

How to price membership tiers

To price membership tiers, start with what each tier costs you to deliver, adjust for how much members will use it and how much of your space it takes at busy times, then set the gaps between tiers so the step up is clearly worth it to the members most likely to take it. The top tier changes how the others look, so price the tiers as a set.

The figures in the examples are hypothetical, so swap in your own costs and usage before setting real prices.

What does each tier cost to deliver?

List every benefit in each tier and put a cost against it. Some benefits cost little to give, such as access to a lounge that is open anyway or a member rate on a room that would otherwise sit empty. Others cost money every time they are used: classes with a paid instructor, spa treatments, parking spaces you could otherwise sell.

Included credit needs particular care. Say a tier includes £50 a month to spend on food and drink. If members redeem £40 of it on average, and the food and drink cost the club 30% of menu price, the credit costs £12 a month per member plus the staff time to serve it. Credit that expires unused lowers the cost further, although members who keep losing it tend to notice.

Add a share of fixed costs, such as rent, salaries and maintenance, to reach a full cost per member, then decide what margin each tier should earn.

How do usage and capacity affect the price?

Two members on the same tier can cost very different amounts. Someone who comes in every day uses far more than someone who visits once a month, so a tier priced on the average makes money on light users and loses it on heavy ones. That is acceptable within a tier, as long as the tiers separate the extremes, for example with an off-peak tier for people who only come at quiet times.

Capacity puts a ceiling on the most popular benefits. Say a studio's peak-time classes hold 20 people and run 15 times a week, giving 300 peak places. If members on the unlimited tier each book two peak classes a week, 150 of them fill every place, and anyone else on that tier finds classes full. Price and cap the top tier for the number of members your busiest hours can hold, and sell off-peak access more cheaply to everyone else.

How far apart should tier prices be?

Each step up should add benefits worth more to the target member than the price difference, judged by what they will use. If the middle tier adds two guest passes a month and gym access, ask whether the members who want those would pay the difference. The gap needs to be wide enough to protect the higher tier's margin and narrow enough that upgrading feels reasonable. A hypothetical club might set it out like this:

TierMonthly priceWhat it addsStep up
Social£90Lounge, bar and restaurant at member pricesNone
Full£150Gym and pool, two guest passes a month£60
Premium£240Priority booking, £50 monthly credit, six guest passes a month£90

Anchoring affects how people read a table like this. A Premium tier at £240 makes £150 look moderate. A club can use that deliberately, but only if the top tier is real and some members buy it. A tier nobody takes looks like a trick to the members who notice.

Keep the number of tiers small enough that members can compare them at a glance. Beyond three or four, the differences start to blur.

Monthly, annual and joining fees within each tier

Decide the payment options once and apply them the same way to every tier. If paying annually saves members two months' fees, keep that rule across all tiers so the comparison stays simple. Joining fees can be flat or scale with the tier. If they scale, decide whether a member who upgrades soon after joining pays the difference, or people will join at the bottom tier to save on the fee and upgrade a week later.

How to design upgrade paths

Members upgrade when they run into the edge of their tier: their guest passes run out before the month ends, they keep paying for classes the next tier includes, or they want to book further ahead. Watch for those moments and make the upgrade easy at that point.

  • Pro-rate upgrades mid-cycle so members don't have to wait for renewal to move up.
  • Let downgrades take effect at the next renewal, so members keep what they have paid for.
  • Show members on a lower tier what the next tier would have given them over the past month.
  • Decide before a price rise whether existing members keep their current price, and for how long.

How to test and review tier prices

Look at the mix of members across tiers each quarter. If almost nobody buys the middle tier, the gap below or above it is probably wrong. If the top tier fills its capacity, it is underpriced or needs a cap. Track how much of each included benefit members use, upgrades and downgrades, and cancellations by tier. If the club has more than one site, count members, usage and cancellations the same way at each site, or the comparison between them won't tell you much. Test new prices on new joiners first, then move existing members at renewal with notice.

Check what your terms allow before moving existing members to a new price. Schedule 2 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 lists a term that lets a trader increase the price without giving the consumer the right to cancel as one that may be unfair, so give notice before the renewal and a clear way to cancel or move to a cheaper tier.

Building tiers in Tiquo

In Tiquo, each tier can be its own membership plan with its own price and a weekly, monthly or yearly billing interval, and members are billed automatically on the plan's schedule. A plan can be assigned to individuals or to companies, can carry permissions for member areas of a website, an app or member-only services, and can be sold through a public signup page embedded on your own website. The memberships page explains how plans connect to bookings and payments, and how gyms and fitness clubs use them.

© 2026 Tiquo. "Tiquo" e o logotipo Tiquo são marcas registadas da Tiquo Ltd.

GDPR · CCPA · PCI DSS · ICO · Cyber Essentials Certified · EU–US DPF · SOC 2 Type II (in progress) · ISO 27001 (in progress)

Security & Operational

  • 99.99% SLA Uptime
  • AES-256 encryption at rest
  • TLS 1.3 in transit
  • AES-256 / TLS 1.3
  • Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)
  • HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
  • 99.999999999% (11 nines) data durability
  • Automated backups
  • DDoS protection
  • Web Application Firewall (WAF)
  • Zero Trust posture
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
  • Principle of Least Privilege
  • Secret scanning in CI
  • SBOM generation
  • Dependency supply-chain controls
  • 24/7 infrastructure monitoring
  • GDPR Article 22 safeguards
  • Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)
  • Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)
  • SAML 2.0 SSO
  • EASIE SSO
  • OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect (OIDC)
  • SCIM 2.0 provisioning
  • MFA / 2FA enforcement
  • Responsible disclosure / bug bounty programme

Privacy, Data Protection & Statutory Obligations

  • ICO Registered
  • UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 compliant
  • UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 compliant
  • EU Article 27 Representative appointed (Paris, France)
  • Swiss FADP Article 14 Representative appointed
  • UK GDPR compliant
  • EU GDPR/DSGVO compliant
  • UK Data Protection Act 2018 compliant
  • Swiss revFADP compliant
  • CCPA / CPRA compliant (California)
  • VCDPA compliant (Virginia)
  • CPA compliant (Colorado)
  • CTDPA compliant (Connecticut)
  • TDPSA compliant (Texas)
  • OCPA compliant (Oregon)
  • MCDPA compliant (Montana)
  • FDBR compliant (Florida)
  • ICDPA compliant (Iowa)
  • ICDPA compliant (Indiana)
  • TIPA compliant (Tennessee)
  • DPDPA compliant (Delaware)
  • NJDPA compliant (New Jersey)
  • NHDPA compliant (New Hampshire)
  • NDPA compliant (Nebraska)
  • MCDPA compliant (Minnesota)
  • MODPA compliant (Maryland)
  • KCDPA compliant (Kentucky)
  • RIDTPPA compliant (Rhode Island)
  • Canada PIPEDA compliant
  • Quebec Law 25 compliant
  • Alberta PIPA compliant
  • British Columbia PIPA compliant
  • Singapore PDPA compliant
  • Hong Kong PDPO compliant
  • Brazil LGPD compliant
  • Japan APPI compliant
  • Australia Privacy Act / APPs compliant
  • India DPDPA 2023 compliant
  • Thailand PDPA compliant
  • Malaysia PDPA 2010 (as amended 2024) compliant
  • New Zealand Privacy Act 2020 compliant
  • South Africa POPIA compliant
  • UAE PDPL compliant
  • Mexico LFPDPPP compliant
  • Kenya Data Protection Act 2019 compliant
  • Ghana Data Protection Act 2012 compliant
  • Nigeria NDPA 2023 compliant
  • Indonesia PDP Law 2022 compliant
  • Philippines Data Privacy Act 2012 compliant

Global Fiscal & E-Invoicing

  • EN 16931 - EU e-invoicing core standard
  • UBL 2.1 - Universal Business Language
  • Austria - RKSV
  • Belgium - Peppol BIS 3.0 (B2B)
  • Czechia - fiscalization
  • Croatia - Fiscalization 2.0
  • Denmark - Peppol BIS 3.0 (B2B)
  • France - NF525 / LNE / Infocert, Factur-X / PDP, E-Reporting
  • Germany - KassenSichV / TSE, DSFinV-K, GoBD, E-Rechnung B2B (XRechnung / ZUGFeRD)
  • Hungary - Online Szamla
  • Italy - Scontrino, FatturaPA (via SDI)
  • Lithuania - i.SAF / i.MAS
  • Norway - Peppol BIS 3.0 (B2B), SAF-T
  • Poland - KSeF
  • Portugal - ATCUD/QR, SAF-T PT
  • Slovakia - eKasa
  • Slovenia - fiscalization (davcno potrjevanje)
  • Spain - FacturaE, SII, VeriFactu, TicketBAI
  • Sweden - SKVFS (certified cash registers)
  • Argentina - ARCA (Q4 2026)
  • Australia - Peppol PINT A-NZ (Q4 2026)
  • Brazil - NFe, NFCe, NFSe (Q4 2026)
  • Chile - SII Chile (Q4 2026)
  • Colombia - DIAN (Q4 2026)
  • Finland - Finvoice, TEAPPSXML (Q4 2026)
  • Japan - JP PINT (Peppol) (Q3 2026)
  • Malaysia - Peppol Malaysia (Q4 2026)
  • Mexico - CFDI (Q4 2026)
  • New Zealand - Peppol PINT A-NZ (Q4 2026)
  • Peru - SUNAT (Q4 2026)
  • Romania - Peppol (RO e-invoice) (Q4 2026)
  • Saudi Arabia - ZATCA (Q4 2026)
  • Singapore - Peppol BIS 3.0 (Q4 2026)
  • United Arab Emirates - Peppol (5C) (Q4 2026)

Standards & Frameworks

  • Cyber Essentials Certified
  • SOC 2 Type II - audit in progress
  • ISO/IEC 27001 - audit in progress
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework - aligned
  • NIST Privacy Framework - aligned
  • NIST SP 800-53 / 800-63 / 800-63B - aligned
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework - aligned
  • CIS Critical Security Controls / CIS Benchmarks - aligned
  • OWASP ASVS & OWASP Top Ten - aligned
  • ISO 25010 (quality) - aligned
  • ISO 31000 (risk) - aligned
  • ITIL - aligned
  • W3C Web Standards - aligned
  • OpenAPI Standard - aligned
  • DevSecOps practices - aligned
  • ePrivacy Directive - aligned
  • EU Whistleblowing Directive (2019/1937) - aligned

Payments Compliance

  • PCI DSS Level 1
  • PSD2 / Strong Customer Authentication
  • 3D Secure (3DS)
  • EMVCo Level 1 & 2
  • AML / KYC controls
  • Sanctions screening (OFAC, UN, EU, HMT)

International Data Transfer Mechanisms

  • EU-US Data Privacy Framework
  • EU Standard Contractual Clauses (Decision 2021/914) - Modules 2 & 3
  • UK International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) + ICO Addendum
  • Swiss FDPIC-recognised transfer mechanisms
  • APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR)

Accessibility Compliance

  • ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) - aligned
  • European Accessibility Act (EAA) 2025 - aligned
  • WCAG 2.2 - aligned
  • EN 301 549 - aligned
  • WAI-ARIA - aligned

Uma plataforma para hotéis, spas, aulas, eventos e restaurantes.

Tiquo Ltd
Londres, Reino Unido

LinkedInTop Performer Spring

Usamos cookies

Escolha se permite cookies de análise e publicidade. Pode aceitá-los ou recusá-los. Fechar este aviso equivale a recusá-los.

Saber mais